top of page

Worry as problem-solving in disguise

Worry is the mind's attempt to plan, applied to a situation that planning cannot finish. One kind of thinking about a problem ends in action; the other ends in more thinking. Telling which one your thinking is doing is the useful distinction.

Two kinds of thinking

When you are problem-solving, the thinking has a shape. There is a question with at least one possible answer you could act on. You think about the question, you reach an answer, and the thinking ends. The thinking might be hard. The answer might be imperfect. But the thinking finishes, because the question is the kind of question that can finish.

Worry has a different shape. It runs through scenarios. It considers what could go wrong. It rehearses the same situation from slightly different angles. It does not finish, because the question worry is asking is usually not the kind of question that has a finishable answer. Will my child be okay? Will my parents get sick? Will the diagnosis come back clear? These are not solvable questions in the way that what do I have for dinner is solvable. No amount of thinking will close them.

Researchers who study worry have consistently described it as primarily verbal and abstract, rather than vivid or imagined. It is the part of the mind that talks to itself about what might happen, not the part that pictures it (Krzikalla et al., 2024). That is part of why worry can run for so long without producing anything. Talking around something is not the same as engaging with it. The mind sounds busy. It is not always doing very much.

A useful working test: if you stayed with the thought for the next twenty minutes, would you arrive at an action you could actually take? If yes, the thinking is doing problem-solving work. If no, the thinking is doing something else. The something else is not nothing. But it is not what it is implicitly promising to deliver.

Why worry feels productive

Most people who worry know that they are worrying. The experience is recognisable from the inside: the same situation considered again, the same scenarios run through, the same anxious tightness underneath. What is less often noticed is what worry is trying to do. It is trying to plan. The mind is treating an uncertain situation the way it treats any situation it wants to handle, by working through it, considering the angles, preparing for what might be needed. This is something the mind does naturally and often usefully. Planning is real work. The catch is that worry is planning that has no end point, because the situation worry is reaching for cannot be planned around in the way the mind wants to plan around it.

Worry is planning that doesn't finish, because the question doesn't finish.

Worry can also loop around questions that have perfectly clear answers, because the worrying itself produces enough doubt to keep the answer from settling. You know what to do. You worry that you might be wrong. The worry produces an alternative. You consider it. Now there are two options to weigh. Then a third. By the end, you have spent an hour producing the impression of thoroughness and you are no closer to acting.

Researchers who study worry have also identified a set of beliefs that most worriers hold about their own worry, often without realising they hold them. If I think about it enough, I will be prepared. If I keep thinking, I will catch the thing I missed. If I stop worrying, I am being careless. These beliefs make worry feel like a form of due diligence (Wells, 2009; Nordahl et al., 2023). There is also a small feedback in the body. Each round of worry tends to produce a brief drop in the anxiety, stress, or nervousness underneath. The drop reinforces the pattern.

Underneath all of this is the deeper experience worry is trying to manage. Not the bad outcome itself. The not-knowing about it. Researchers describe this underlying experience as intolerance of uncertainty, and current evidence suggests it is the more fundamental driver of much of what we call worry (Nasling et al., 2024). Worry is what the mind does when it cannot bear the uncertainty long enough to wait and see.

What this distinction is for

The point of separating worry from problem-solving is not to never worry. Most people worry sometimes. The point is to be able to tell, when you notice yourself thinking about something, which one your thinking is doing.

Things you might notice, once you have this frame: that you have been pre-living conversations that may or may not happen, in detail, multiple times. That you have been running scenarios about other people's decisions, which you cannot affect, for hours on end. That you have been preparing for what might happen if a feared thing came true, when the preparation could not actually be made until the thing happened. That you have spent a long time considering options when you already knew what you were going to do, because the worrying produced enough doubt to delay the doing.

These are observations to hold, not conclusions to act on. None of them is a sign that something is wrong with you. They are common. They are also, once seen, harder to keep doing without noticing.

If the noticing leaves you with the impression that worry is doing most of your thinking for you, the next useful question is not how do I stop. It is what is this trying to do, and what would the real thing it is reaching for actually look like. That is usually a longer conversation than this guide. It is the kind of conversation many people have with someone trained in it.

Worry feels like planning, and much of the time, it is planning that cannot land where it is trying to land. The distinction between worry and problem-solving is one of the more useful frames for noticing what your thinking is actually doing, once you have stopped to look. Hold it lightly. If it helps you describe what your thinking is doing, to yourself or to someone else, it has done its job.

Read further

References

  1. Krzikalla, C., Buhlmann, U., Schug, J., Kopei, I., Gerlach, A. L., Doebler, P., Morina, N., & Andor, T. (2024). Worry postponement from the metacognitive perspective: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(2), Article e12741. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12741
  2. Näsling, J., Åström, E., Jacobsson, L., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2024). Effect of psychotherapy on intolerance of uncertainty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 31(4), e3026. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.3026
  3. Nordahl, H. M., Hjemdal, O., Hagen, R., Nysæter, T. E., & Wells, A. (2023). An empirical test of the metacognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12884
  4. Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. Guilford Press.

This content is general information only. It is not a substitute for individual psychological or medical advice. If something here resonates and you would like to talk it through with someone, the Meet and Greet is a free 15-minute call or in-person meeting, with no obligation, to see if we are the right fit. If you are in crisis or at immediate risk, contact 000, or call Lifeline on 13 11 14.

To talk this through with a psychologist, you can book a Meet and Greet: free · 15 minutes · online or in-person · no obligation. Book a Meet and Greet.

bottom of page