"Why do I freeze or shut down when I try to remember?"
Freezing and shutting down are not signs of weakness or avoidance. They are nervous system protective responses that the body has learned to use when the conditions for processing are not in place.
Need help right now? Crisis 000 · Lifeline 13 11 14 · Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636 · Suicide Call Back 1300 659 467
What freeze actually is
Freeze and shutdown are part of a family of nervous system responses to threat. Where fight-or-flight involves mobilisation (raised heart rate, increased muscle tension, readiness to act), freeze and shutdown involve the opposite. Heart rate slows, muscles lose tone, the felt sense narrows or goes blank, time can distort, and the person may experience a sense of being "outside" themselves. The body has put down its defences not because the threat is gone, but because it has assessed that mobilisation is not survivable.
In the narrative exposure therapy literature, freeze and shutdown are recognised as part of the body's threat response, alongside fight and flight (Schauer, Neuner & Elbert, 2011). They are not failure modes of the system. They are completion modes for situations in which active defence would not have worked.
Why it happens when you try to remember
The conditions inside a trauma memory often included the conditions that produced the freeze response in the first place: overwhelm, no clear path of escape, and no available repair. When the memory is approached, the body recognises the conditions and recreates the response it learned then. The freeze is not happening because the present is dangerous. It is happening because the implicit-memory record of the past includes the freeze, and accessing the memory accesses the response.
This is closely related to the framework of the window of tolerance described by Siegel in 1999. Inside the window, the body can be present with material. Outside the window, in either direction, the system goes into protection. Freeze and shutdown sit at the lower edge: the system has dropped below what it can hold while staying present.
What this means in trauma work
Trying to push through freeze, by force of will or by repeating the attempt, generally does not work and can teach the body that approaching the material produces overwhelm. The phased approach to trauma treatment, recommended in Australian and international guidelines, builds in stabilisation work first, with the explicit goal of widening the window of tolerance before processing (Coventry et al., 2020).
In practice, this means learning to recognise the early signals of leaving the window, building tools that bring the system back into it, and approaching the memory only at moments and in doses the system can hold. The slow pacing is not delay. It is what makes any further work possible.
How to think about your own freeze
If you freeze when you try to remember, the response is the system protecting you, not failing you. The protection may be unwelcome. It may feel embarrassing or inconvenient. It is also the most honest information the body can give about whether the current conditions are conditions it can settle into.
Freeze is part of the body's protective language. It is not a verdict on your readiness for therapy or your capacity to do trauma work. It is information about the conditions, including the conditions of the moment and the conditions inside the memory. Working with the response, rather than against it, is part of how trauma therapy actually proceeds, and the slowness of that work is harder to sit with than the intuition allows.
Read further
- The nervous system, and being retraumatised by telling — Why stabilisation precedes processing. (Guide · 6 min read)
- "Why does my body remember things my mind does not?" — Why the body holds what the mind cannot retrieve. (Answer · 3 min)
- If you'd like to talk to someone — The Meet and Greet is a short call to see whether one of us is the right fit, before you commit to anything.
References
- Coventry, P. A., Meader, N., Melton, H., Temple, M., Dale, H., Wright, K., Cloitre, M., Karatzias, T., Bisson, J., Roberts, N. P., Brown, J. V. E., Barbui, C., Churchill, R., Lovell, K., McMillan, D., & Gilbody, S. (2020). Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 17(8), e1003262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262
- Schauer, M., Neuner, F., & Elbert, T. (2011). Narrative exposure therapy: A short-term treatment for traumatic stress disorders (2nd ed.). Hogrefe.
- Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Press.
This content is general information only. It is not a substitute for individual psychological or medical advice. Reading this does not establish a therapeutic relationship with Equal Psychology or any of their clinicians.
.png)